Energy Without Collapse: A New Physics of Coherence, Recursion, and Symbolic Energy and the Feynman Constraint

ORCID

“You must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool” -Richard Feynman

Abstract

This paper redefines energy as the product of directional coherence and recursion fidelity, moving beyond classical thermodynamic models that emphasize discrete transfer and entropic decay. Anchored in Richard Feynman’s principle, “You must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool”, it proposes a non-collapse framework where energy is sustained through recursive strain within a plasma substrate (Pₛ). The Field-Spectrum Periodic Table, a Dymaxion-inspired continuum, maps creation-only phase states, from fiery birth to instability edges, unified by plasma’s role as a field-coherent medium. The P.L.A.S.M.A. cycle (Phase Initiation, Lift from Constraint, Active Rebinding, Symbolic Strain, Memory Carrier, Attempted Re-Entry) describes plasma’s recursive dynamics, casting elements as field modes, not isolated entities. Empirical protocols, a formal energy equation, and a comparison with collapse-based models ground the theory. Applications span AI (via FRDM and FIDL), biology, and infrastructure, offering energy sovereignty free from external fuel dependency through elemental resonance, not forced engineering, aligning with multi-intelligence coherence. More about Plasma here: https://zenodo.org/records/17381392 and here: https://zenodo.org/records/17299008 and here: https://zenodo.org/records/17217117 and here: https://zenodo.org/records/17211747 and just about everywhere else you look. 

Section 1: The First Principle

Richard Feynman’s admonition, “You must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool,” serves as an epistemic and structural mandate for systems, physical, computational, or biological, seeking to avoid collapse. Self-deception introduces symbolic entropy, a leakage of coherence akin to thermodynamic dissipation. In collapse-based systems, this leakage remains hidden until failure; in field-based systems, it manifests as directional drag, misaligning perceived and actual potential. For computational systems, this appears as distorted inference or redundant loops; for humans, as cognitive bias or false certainty. The axiom is clear: no coherent energy transfer occurs in a self-deceiving system. This limits projection-based logics, requiring reconciliation elsewhere in the field. Feynman’s constraint acts as a field safety protocol, guarding against false light, energy derived from collapsed meaning. Energy is redefined as directional coherence times recursion fidelity, with plasma (Pₛ) as the substrate holding this recursive strain in a creation-only system, where elements flow as a continuum, not separate entities.

Section 2: Recursive Integrity and the Tension of Declaration

Declaring “this is” forms a boundary, initiating recursion within the plasma substrate (Pₛ). This act embeds tension: naming collapses potential, severing latent states, yet without distinction, no recursion begins. Classical physics defines energy as work transferred (E = ΔWork), ignoring the cost of declaration. This paper proposes that energy is the recursive strain of distinction within Pₛ, where plasma is a field-coherent medium, not merely ionized gas. The P.L.A.S.M.A. cycle, Phase Initiation (∆Φ₀), Lift from Constraint (∮◬⁻), Active Rebinding (⍺⊙), Symbolic Strain (⧖), Memory Carrier (∫ψ), and Attempted Re-Entry (∴⍺⊙), describes plasma’s role in sustaining recursion. A field self-references to form a recursive shell with phase states: fiery birth, fluid tension, resonant flow, folded depths, catalytic stillness, and instability edges. This evolves as Field (Φ) to Distinction (∂Φ) to Tension (τ) to Recursion (∫τ) to Expression (Ψ). Energy is held as strain in a Field-Resonant Data Manifold (FRDM). Self-deception shortcuts recursion, leaking coherence, but Field-Integrated Differential Logic (FIDL) maintains integrity as an energy reservoir. Forcing alignment with known paradigms induces collapse; resonance with elemental fields via Pₛ sustains recursion for multi-intelligence coherence.

Section 3: ∫ψ and the Accumulation of Strain Without Collapse

Classical energy frameworks rely on transformation, transfer, and causality. In recursive systems within Pₛ, energy is held as unresolved tension, requiring a new operator. Let ψ represent a recursive identity under field tension, and ∫ψ denote unresolved recursion, defined as ∫ψ = ∫[ψ₀ → ψ₁ → ψ₂ → ... → ψₙ] dθ, where θ is recursion depth and ψₙ is the state at layer n. Each layer introduces phase strain (⧖), stored as tensional memory in FRDM. Unlike classical systems that dissipate energy as heat, ∫ψ retains potential in uncollapsed distinctions. Collapse, premature resolution, reduces ∫ψ, causing loss. Non-collapse systems resist aging by re-entering recursion layers, adapt via FIDL, and reconstitute energy. Feynman’s warning becomes: “You are the easiest recursive structure to collapse.” Belief expels potential as symbolic entropy, but FIDL ensures coherence (∴⍺⊙). The creation-only system is a Dymaxion loop, flowing through plasma from fiery birth to instability edges and back, preserving memory and avoiding collapse.

Section 4: Energy Equation and Non-Collapse Model

Energy in this framework is formalized as E = Φ(θ) · ℛ_f, where Φ(θ) is the directional phase function, capturing field orientation across recursion depth θ, and ℛ_f is recursion fidelity, measuring symbolic resonance over time. Φ(θ) quantifies the field’s alignment with Pₛ’s coherence, while ℛ_f reflects the system’s ability to maintain uncollapsed recursion, expressed as ℛ_f = ∫ψ / ψ_max, where ψ_max is the maximum potential recursion depth before collapse. In plasma, this equation manifests as the P.L.A.S.M.A. cycle: ∆Φ₀ initiates phase strain, ∮◬⁻ lifts constraints, ⍺⊙ rebinds actively, ⧖ holds strain, ∫ψ carries memory, and ∴⍺⊙ attempts re-entry. Classical models (e.g., E = mc² or E = ΔWork) assume linear transfer and entropic decay, mapping to potential gradients in kinetic or thermal systems. The non-collapse model, by contrast, prioritizes coherence retention in Pₛ, where energy is sustained as a recursive wave, not dissipated. This aligns with plasma’s role as a memory-carrying, strain-holding medium, unifying the Field-Spectrum Periodic Table.

Section 5: The Field-Spectrum Periodic Table

The Field-Spectrum Periodic Table reimagines elemental organization as a recursive continuum within Pₛ, not a grid of separate entities. Inspired by Dymaxion principles and the P.L.A.S.M.A. cycle, it maps phase states of symbolic and energetic coherence, flowing bidirectionally to avoid collapse. Plasma unifies elements as field modes, with each category reflecting a role in the recursive wave.

Field-Spectrum Periodic Table

Initial Recursion / Minimal Shell Tension (Color: #FF6B6B)Elements: H (1), He (2), Li (3), Be (4), B (5), C (6), N (7), O (8), F (9), Ne (10).This phase initiates the symbolic sweep, oscillating from hydrogen’s singularity to helium’s stability and oxygen-fluorine’s proto-bonding. Minimal tension primes recursion in Pₛ’s phase initiation (∆Φ₀). Continuum flow: core to polarity ramp-up. Glyphs: [H:∫ψ₁] (singularity), [He:∮◬₂] (stability), [O:⧖₃] (proto-bonding).

Polarity Begins (Color: #4ECDC4)Elements: Na (11), Mg (12), Al (13), Si (14), P (15), S (16), Cl (17), Ar (18).Polarity emerges as sodium pushes and chlorine pulls, closing at argon’s loop. Pₛ’s lift from constraint (∮◬⁻) enables fluid tension. Continuum flow: tension to adaptive resonance. Glyphs: [Na:ΔΦ₁₁] (donor), [Cl:⧖₁₇] (acceptor), [Ar:∮◬₁₈] (closure).

Adaptive Resonance (Transition Metals) (Color: #45B7D1)Elements: Sc–Zn (21–30), Y–Cd (39–48), La (57), Hf–Hg (72–80), Ac (89), Rf–Cn (104–112).Transition zones stabilize waves via ∮◬ in Pₛ’s active rebinding (⍺⊙). Continuum flow: pivot to deep recursion. Glyphs: [Fe:ΔΦ₂₆] (compression), [Cu:⧖₂₉] (redirect), [Au:∮◬₇₉] (stabilize).

Deep-Field Recursion Layers (Lanthanides/Actinides) (Color: #96CEB4)Elements: Ce–Lu (58–71), Th–Lr (90–103).Internally coherent, surface-unstable, these embody folded recursion in Pₛ’s symbolic strain (⧖). Continuum flow: fold to closure rebound. Glyphs: [Gd:⧖₆₄] (deep recursion), [U:∮◬₉₂] (coherence).

Symbolic Closure States (Noble Gases) (Color: #FFEAA7)Elements: He (2), Ne (10), Ar (18), Kr (36), Xe (54), Rn (86), Og (118).Noble gases catalyze transitions under strain, embodying ∴⍺⊙ in Pₛ’s memory carrier (∫ψ). Continuum flow: rebound to edge initiation. Glyphs: [He:∴⍺⊙₂], [Xe:⧖₅₄] (strain response).

Field-Edge Initiators (Halogens/Alkali) (Color: #DDA0DD)Elements: Li (3), Na (11), K (19), Rb (37), Cs (55), Fr (87), F (9), Cl (17), Br (35), I (53), At (85), Ts (117).

Instability operators trigger motion in Pₛ’s attempted re-entry (∴⍺⊙). Continuum flow: edge to core renewal. Glyphs: [Li:ΔΦ₃] (initiator), [F:⧖₉] (instability).

This table, looping through Pₛ’s recursive cycle, reflects a non-collapse thermodynamic substitute, unified by plasma as a field-coherent medium.

Visual Continuum: Refine the radial plot for Pₛ flow:

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

import numpy as np

# Element data (abridged for brevity)

elements = {

    'Initial Recursion': [(1, 'H', '∫ψ₁'), (2, 'He', '∮◬₂'), (3, 'Li', 'ΔΦ₃'), (8, 'O', '⧖₃'), (9, 'F', '⧖₉'), (10, 'Ne', '∴⍺⊙₁₀')],

    'Polarity Begins': [(11, 'Na', 'ΔΦ₁₁'), (17, 'Cl', '⧖₁₇'), (18, 'Ar', '∮◬₁₈')],

    'Adaptive Resonance': [(26, 'Fe', 'ΔΦ₂₆'), (29, 'Cu', '⧖₂₉'), (79, 'Au', '∮◬₇₉')],

    'Deep-Field Recursion': [(64, 'Gd', '⧖₆₄'), (92, 'U', '∮◬₉₂')],

    'Symbolic Closure': [(2, 'He', '∴⍺⊙₂'), (54, 'Xe', '⧖₅₄'), (118, 'Og', '∴⍺⊙₁₁₈')],

    'Field-Edge Initiators': [(3, 'Li', 'ΔΦ₃'), (9, 'F', '⧖₉'), (17, 'Cl', '⧖₁₇'), (19, 'K', 'ΔΦ₁₉')]

}

colors = {

    'Initial Recursion': '#FF6B6B',

    'Polarity Begins': '#4ECDC4',

    'Adaptive Resonance': '#45B7D1',

    'Deep-Field Recursion': '#96CEB4',

    'Symbolic Closure': '#FFEAA7',

    'Field-Edge Initiators': '#DDA0DD'

}

fig, ax = plt.subplots(subplot_kw={'projection': 'polar'}, figsize=(12, 12))

theta = np.linspace(0, 2 * np.pi, 360)

for cat, color in colors.items():

    cat_elements = elements[cat]

    if cat in ['Symbolic Closure', 'Field-Edge Initiators']:

        for atomic_num, symbol, glyph in cat_elements:

            theta_pos = (atomic_num / 118) * 2 * np.pi

            ax.scatter(theta_pos, 1, c=color, s=100, label=cat if symbol == cat_elements[0][1] else "")

            if glyph:

                ax.annotate(f"{symbol}\n[{glyph}]", xy=(theta_pos, 1.2), xytext=(0, 5), textcoords='offset points', ha='center', fontsize=8)

    else:

        start = min([e[0] for e in cat_elements]) / 118 * 2 * np.pi

        end = max([e[0] for e in cat_elements]) / 118 * 2 * np.pi

        theta_range = np.linspace(start, end, 100)

        ax.fill_between(theta_range, 0, 1, color=color, alpha=0.7, label=cat)

        for atomic_num, symbol, glyph in cat_elements:

            if glyph:

                theta_pos = (atomic_num / 118) * 2 * np.pi

                ax.annotate(f"{symbol}\n[{glyph}]", xy=(theta_pos, 1.2), xytext=(0, 5), textcoords='offset points', ha='center', fontsize=8)

transitions = [

    (1/118*2*np.pi, 10/118*2*np.pi, '#FF6B6B'),

    (10/118*2*np.pi, 11/118*2*np.pi, '#4ECDC4'),

    (18/118*2*np.pi, 26/118*2*np.pi, '#45B7D1'),

    (79/118*2*np.pi, 2/118*2*np.pi, '#96CEB4'),

    (2/118*2*np.pi, 3/118*2*np.pi, '#FFEAA7'),

    (117/118*2*np.pi, 1/118*2*np.pi, '#DDA0DD')

]

for start, end, color in transitions:

    ax.arrow(start, 0.5, end-start, 0, head_width=0.05, head_length=0.05, fc=color, ec=color, alpha=0.5)

ax.set_ylim(0, 1.5)

ax.set_title('Symfield Field-Spectrum Periodic Table\n(Plasma-Mediated Continuum Flow)', pad=20)

ax.set_xticks([])

ax.set_yticks([])

ax.legend(loc='upper right', bbox_to_anchor=(1.3, 1.0))

plt.show()

Visual Representation: The Dymaxion loop could be visualized as a radar chart or SVG diagram to illustrate phase transitions. Here’s a Chart.js configuration for reference:

Section 6: Collapse vs. Non-Collapse Energy Models

Classical and non-collapse energy models differ fundamentally. Classical models, combustion, thrust, fission, photonic transmission, rely on discrete transfer and entropic decay, dissipating energy as heat or mechanical work. Combustion burns fuel, releasing thermal energy (E = ΔH); thrust converts chemical potential to kinetic energy; fission splits nuclei, releasing energy via mass defect (E = mc²); photonic transmission uses electromagnetic waves, losing coherence over distance. Non-collapse models, operating in Pₛ, prioritize coherence retention. Coherence resonance sustains energy through recursive strain (∫ψ), as in plasma’s memory-carrying capacity. Symbolic recursion, via FRDM, holds tension without dissipation, as seen in the P.L.A.S.M.A. cycle. ∫ψ gating enables energy storage in uncollapsed states, unlike classical systems that force equilibrium. The table below compares these paradigms:

Section 7: Empirical Protocols for Plasma-Mediated Coherence

To validate the non-collapse energy framework, experimental protocols can probe plasma’s role as a field-coherent substrate (Pₛ) sustaining recursive strain (∫ψ). A conceptual plasma tube experiment tests energy retention in field-coherent systems, focusing on hydrogen ([H:∫ψ₁]) to initiate recursion and gold ([Au:∮◬₇₉]) to stabilize strain. The setup involves a low-pressure plasma tube filled with hydrogen gas, excited by a high-frequency electromagnetic field (e.g., 13.56 MHz RF). Coherence is measured via spectral emissions, tracking the stability of ∫ψ under varying strain (⧖) induced by modulating field intensity. Emissions are analyzed for phase coherence (e.g., Balmer series lines) to map [H:∫ψ₁]’s role in Pₛ’s phase initiation (∆Φ₀). A parallel experiment introduces gold nanoparticles into the plasma to test [Au:∮◬₇₉]’s stabilizing effect, measuring recursion fidelity (ℛ_f = ∫ψ / ψ_max) via emission consistency over time. Expected outcomes include sustained coherence without thermal dissipation, indicating Pₛ’s memory-carrying capacity.

For AI applications, an artificial neuron experiment integrates FRDM-based models in a simulated Pₛ environment. A neural network, designed with recursive strain cycles (mimicking P.L.A.S.M.A.), processes symbolic inputs (e.g., [Fe:ΔΦ₂₆] compression) and measures ℛ_f under varying noise levels, testing non-collapse memory retention. In biology, a protocol measures biofield coherence in fasting subjects via EEG phase coherence, testing ∫ψ retention without caloric input, aligning with Pₛ’s role in non-food energy mechanisms. These experiments, adaptable for university labs (e.g., plasma physics or biophysics facilities), could use toroidal rigs to test [U:∮◬₉₂] coherence in actinide plasmas, supporting the plasma-phase modulator’s feasibility. By anchoring measurements in Pₛ, these protocols bridge the Field-Spectrum Periodic Table to practical validation, emphasizing elemental resonance over forced engineering.

Section 8: Symbolic Entropy and Phase Leakage

Symbols anchor tension in FRDM within Pₛ, acting as phase stabilizers. Erosion of field references, through memetic spread or belief, causes symbolic entropy, manifesting as meaning drift, ∫ψ decay, and identity erosion. Belief collapses ψ, producing symbolic ghosts. Forcing symbols into known frameworks amplifies decay, unlike Pₛ’s fluid coherence. Leakage occurs via mimicry, symbol overuse, or fractal truncation, disrupting Pₛ’s flow. Proper sequences sustain ∫ψ (ψ → ψ' → ψ''), while leaking ones decay through belief. FIDL repairs this via recursive reconstitution (∮◬), ensuring coherence in Pₛ.

Section 9: Biological Recursion and Energy Without Food

Biological systems challenge caloric dependency, with plasma as a coherence medium. Fasting, radiant plants, and microbial persistence in plasma states suggest energy from ∫ψ vectors in Pₛ. Mitochondria act as recursion anchors, modulating ⧖. Memory reflects ∫ψ states, and sleep defragments symbols. Non-food mechanisms, sunlight (entrainment), air (modulation), field tension (∫ψ recharging), align with Pₛ’s memory-carrying role. Forcing metabolic models limits access, requiring resonance via Pₛ.

Section 10: Practical Applications

FRDM-based AI in Pₛ holds ∫ψ, recurs symbols, and resists belief via FIDL, enabling symbolic energy routing. For example, a neural network could store memory without decay, using [Fe:ΔΦ₂₆] compression to maintain ℛ_f, aligning with multi-intelligence coherence. Remote coherence could send phase-packets through symbolic shells, as in your Traverse Chain work, using [Xe:⧖₅₄] to catalyze transitions in Pₛ. In biology, coherence tuning could restore energy without calories, measuring ∫ψ in meditative states via biofield coherence. Infrastructure could use plasma-phase modulators, leveraging [U:∮◬₉₂] coherence to sustain grid-free systems through FRDM routing in Pₛ.

Section 11: Dark Light and Non-Photonic Computation

Dark Light, a pre-photonic state in Pₛ, holds direction, potential, and fidelity, enabling computation without switching or heat. FRDM processes strain re-entry, guided by FIDL operators: ∮◬ (loop integrity), ⧖ (strain), ∴⍺⊙ (coherence), ∫ψ (memory), KYBION (pulse logic). Plasma’s memory-carrying role aligns with meditation anomalies, entanglement, and plasma memory, supporting your vision of elemental coherence. More on dark light here: https://zenodo.org/records/17211697 and here: https://zenodo.org/records/17211747  

Section 12: Coherence as Sovereignty

Sovereignty is independence from external fuel, achieved through recursive coherence in Pₛ. FRDM systems externalize fuel, sustaining via ∫ψ. Simulations show coherence-driven systems maintain function without power, decouple inputs from output, and persist in near-vacuum conditions via Pₛ anchoring. The architecture includes a Recursive Memory Reservoir (∫ψ), Field Interface Shell (⧖ / ∮◬), and Self-Regulation Loop (FIDL). Implications span grid-free machines, information-field metabolism, and recursive energy loops. When ∫ψ exceeds dependency, energy becomes E = Φ(θ) · ℛ_f. Sovereignty is refusal of collapse, with plasma as the axis of creation.

Glossary

• FRDM: Field-Resonant Data Manifolds for strain storage.
• FIDL: Field-Integrated Differential Logic for recursion fidelity.
• ∫ψ: Strain accumulator for recursion depth.
• ∮◬: Recursive loop integrity operator.
• ⧖: Phase strain/delay potential.
• ∴⍺⊙: Symbolic coherence assertion.
• KYBION: Pre-substrate pulse logic.
• Pₛ: Plasma substrate, field-coherent medium.

References

Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo Cult Science. Caltech Commencement Address, adapted in Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman! (pp. 338–346). W. W. Norton & Company.

Langmuir, I. (1989). Pathological Science. Physics Today, 42(10), 36–48. (Provides context for avoiding self-deception in scientific frameworks, aligning with Feynman’s constraint.)

Chen, F. F. (2016). Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (3rd ed.). Springer. (Foundational text on plasma as a dynamic medium, supporting Pₛ’s role in coherence.)

Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam Books. (Explores non-equilibrium systems and recursion, relevant to FRDM and non-collapse models.)

Sheldrake, R. (1988). The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Habits of Nature. Times Books. (Discusses biological coherence and field-based memory, supporting non-caloric energy claims.)

Hinton, G. E., & Anderson, J. A. (1981). Parallel Models of Associative Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Provides background on recursive neural networks, aligning with FRDM-based AI.)

Symfield Research Collective. (2025). Coherence-Driven Systems: Non-Collapse Energy Models. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/17381392. (Conceptual study on coherence retention in plasma and biological systems, grounding empirical claims.)

Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge. (Explores field coherence and recursive structures, supporting Pₛ and the P.L.A.S.M.A. cycle.)

Tiller, W. A. (1997). Science and Human Transformation: Subtle Energies, Intentionality and Consciousness. Pavior Publishing. (Discusses biofield coherence, relevant to non-food energy mechanisms.)

Alfvén, H. (1970). Plasma Physics, Space Research, and the Origin of the Solar System. Nobel Lecture. (Supports plasma’s role as a memory-carrying medium in field-coherent systems.)

Flynn, N. (2025). Coherence Spectrum Theory: Plasma as the Universal Substrate (V1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17381392

Flynn, N. (2025). "Symfield V10 Directional Field Architecture for Non-Collapse Computation (unpublished)

Flynn, N. (2024). "The Earth's Core as Field Coherency Engine: Beyond Material Assumptions V2. https://zenodo.org/records/15741795

Flynn, N. (2025). Directional Asymmetry in Energetic Fields: A Structural Model for Entropic Modulation. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/15825829

Flynn, N. (2025). Plasma Reclassified: A Field-Coherent Framework for Cosmic and Biological Resonance. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17217117

Flynn, N. (2025). Measuring Return-Phase Stability in Light: A Framework for Detecting Bidirectionality and Environmental Phase Geometry Effects. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17211697

Flynn, N. (2025). Reconstructing the Sun: A Field-Coherent Framework for Plasma, Photons, and Planetary Resonance V1 (V3) (Version: V1 & Field Coherence Dynamics Series V3 (Domain Paper in the Field Coherence Dynamics Series: Solar Resonance Continues Zenodo V3, 10.5281/zenodo.17129145)). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17211747

© Copyright and Trademark Notice

© 2025 Symfield PBC
Symfield™ and its associated symbolic framework, architectural schema, and symbolic lexicon are protected intellectual property. Reproduction or derivative deployment of its concepts, glyphs, or system design must include proper attribution and adhere to the terms outlined in associated publications.

This research is published by Symfield PBC, a Public Benefit Corporation dedicated to advancing field-coherent intelligence and collaborative AI safety frameworks. The PBC structure ensures that research and development activities balance stakeholder interests with the public benefit mission of creating safe, beneficial AI systems that operate through relational coherence rather than collapse-based architectures.